Field-specific reviewer simulation for identifying gaps and providing improvement suggestions in your academic texts — on Tedkik
Get recommendations to enhance publication quality by identifying methodological, structural, and argumentative gaps through simulated evaluation based on field-specific reviewer standards
Scientific Reviewer and Evaluation Portal
Drag or select your file
Drag and drop a DOCX file
Selecting a work type improves the accuracy of analysis results.
Your file is processed securely. Your personal data is not shared with third parties.
Please complete the following:
Your Analysis Has Started!
Your analysis is being processed in the background. You can continue browsing the site or start a new analysis. Track progress from the notification area in the bottom right corner.
If email notifications are enabled, you will receive an email when the analysis is complete. You can also track it from the notification widget.
Preparing...
Elapsed Time
00:00
Remaining Time
--:--
An error occurred
An unexpected error occurred during analysis.
File:
How it works
Upload document
Upload your academic text or supporting document.
Select Work Type and Field
Choose the target academic work type and the main science or art field.
Submit for review
Submit to start the automated review process.
Review the results
View structural feedback, scores, and improvement suggestions.
Domestic & National Technology
No API dependency, 100% domestic referee simulation.
Auditable Transparency
Your texts are never used in AI model training.
Total Data Privacy
Your information is never shared with third parties in any way.
Data Ownership Guarantee
Every word you submit is your intellectual property.
Domestic & National Technology
No API dependency, 100% domestic referee simulation.
Auditable Transparency
Your texts are never used in AI model training.
Total Data Privacy
Your information is never shared with third parties in any way.
Data Ownership Guarantee
Every word you submit is your intellectual property.
Tedkik's Features
All the analysis, review, and simulation tools you need to prepare your academic texts for publication — in one platform.
Content Analysis
The thesis or article is reviewed for academic writing principles and information consistency. Content and contextual gaps are identified with comprehensive cause-effect correction suggestions.
Formal Analysis
All formal aspects of the work including language, spelling, punctuation, terminology, and style are reviewed. Comprehensive correction suggestions are provided for identified expression errors and gaps.
Risk Analysis
Critical gaps that could affect the academic validity of the work are identified based on reviewer and jury evaluation criteria, with risk analysis and improvement suggestions.
Argument Analysis
The work's core purpose, main thesis, and defended arguments are analyzed within textual integrity. Hypothesis consistency is reviewed with improvement suggestions.
References and Citation Analysis
References and in-text citations are meticulously checked. Formal and structural correction suggestions aligned with APA, MLA, Chicago styles are provided.
Literature Analysis
The currency and sufficiency of the literature used is analyzed. Source recommendations are provided to enhance the theoretical depth of the work in light of key references in the field.
Structure and Organization Analysis
The logical flow and volumetric balance of introduction, method, findings, and conclusion sections are analyzed. Suggestions to enhance the structural soundness of the text are provided.
Quality Enhancement Analysis
Strategic elements and advanced academic writing techniques are recommended to meet SSCI, SCI, AHCI, and Scopus-indexed journal standards.
Readability Analysis
The text's readability index is calculated to identify complex structures and style errors that weaken flow, with concrete improvement suggestions.
Blind Review/Authorship Analysis
Within academic ethical standards, elements that could compromise reviewers' objective judgment or confidentiality are identified, with ethical compliance recommendations.
Thematic Analysis
All components are evaluated against international index standards. A success score reflecting the text's academic competence and strategic feedback are provided.
CONSORT 2025 Checklist Analysis
The work undergoes technical review according to CONSORT 2025 standards. Elements weakening methodological compliance are identified to improve reporting quality.
What is Tedkik?
Tedkik is an academic evaluation platform specifically developed for scientific academic texts. It provides a comprehensive analysis by examining not only language and writing errors, but also the structure of the academic text, methodological soundness, argument consistency, and section integrity. By simulating the perspective of real reviewers, it helps you see not only the readability of your work, but also how ready it is for the peer-reviewed journal process.
Deep Academic Analysis
Tedkik evaluates main sections such as abstract, introduction, method, and findings from the perspective of a field-expert reviewer.
Reviewer-Focused Feedback
Tedkik presents its feedback in a sectioned format similar to reviewer reports used in journals.
Faster Submission Preparation
Tedkik makes structural and methodological issues visible before submission, helping you catch major errors before sending to the journal.
We meticulously examine every stage of your work.
Tedkik evaluates your academic text across 4 distinct layers — structural, linguistic, and academic depth — by simulating a review panel's perspective.
Structural Analysis
Examines the academic skeleton of the text and the logical structure between sections.
Structural Order
The logical ordering and hierarchy of sections are evaluated.
Transition Analysis
Semantic bridges between paragraphs are analyzed.
Format Compliance
Heading and subheading structure is reviewed.
Focus Point
Introduction–conclusion relationship and main thesis consistency are checked.
Tedkik in Numbers
The trust and impact we create in the academic ecosystem.
4.85/5
Satisfaction Rate
0+
Completed Analyses
0+
Users
0
Corporate Memberships