Tedkik for Editors
Dear Editors,
Support your editorial assessments with analytics from an independent infrastructure; structural and formal findings become visible the moment each manuscript arrives.
Invite your team, leave notes on the findings, export outputs in the format you need, and make your decision with evidence on a single screen.
Start Reviewing
Team Invitation
Invite team members to a manuscript
Editor Notes
Add your notes on the findings
Report Outputs
Export analyses in different formats
Access and Visibility
You decide who sees what
Decision time shapes journal reputation
Fast yet consistent editorial decisions directly influence author satisfaction and journal credibility.
Reviewing alone is hard
Going through a manuscript end-to-end solo takes time; team invites and finding-level notes distribute the load.
Maintaining standards is hard
Assessment differences between reviewers weaken consistency.
Early screening creates leverage
An initial check step reduces the load on the reviewer network.
Editorial Process Challenges, Tedkik's Response
On the left, challenges the editor faces; on the right, Tedkik's pre-submission response.
What Does the Editor Audit?
Editor-level audit areas and Tedkik's automated summary report, side by side
Scope and Audience Fit
Does it match our scope and goals?
Whether the manuscript aligns with the journal's scope and target audience is evaluated.
Methodological Clarity
Is the methodology sufficiently clear?
Whether the research design and methodology are clear, reproducible, and consistent is examined.
Originality and Contribution
What is the original contribution of the work?
The original contribution and novelty dimension the work brings to the field is analyzed.
Citation and Reference Adequacy
Is the citation list adequate and up to date?
The completeness, currency, and in-text citation consistency of the reference list are verified.
Reviewer Assignment Fit
Which reviewer should evaluate this manuscript?
Structural indicators of which expertise area the manuscript should be evaluated under are identified.
Revision Request Clarity
Is the revision request clear and actionable?
Whether the feedback to be communicated to the author is concrete, measurable, and actionable is evaluated.
Platform at a Glance
Tedkik is an analysis platform running on an independent LLM infrastructure without reliance on external services. Submitted manuscripts are never shared with third-party systems; they are processed solely for analysis. It produces consistent, traceable, and comparable findings for editors.
Confidentiality and Editorial Independence
Manuscripts submitted for review are never sent, shared, or analyzed — directly or indirectly — by any structure, company, or external model. Tedkik runs entirely on local models over infrastructure allocated by Tedkik engineers on Turkey-located servers; your editorial processes are completed end-to-end on this infrastructure.
Standardize Editorial Quality
Evaluate manuscripts with consistent analysis and ground your editorial decisions in data.