Tedkik's Features
Analysis Types
Deeply examine every dimension of your academic work with 12 different analysis types.
Content Analysis
The thesis or article is reviewed for academic writing principles and information consistency. Content and contextual gaps are identified and comprehensive cause-effect-based correction suggestions are provided.
Formal Analysis
All formal features of the work including language, spelling, punctuation, terminology and style are examined. Comprehensive correction suggestions are provided for identified expression errors and deficiencies.
Risk Analysis
In line with reviewer and jury evaluation criteria, critical deficiencies that may affect the academic validity of the work are identified and improvement suggestions are provided through risk analysis.
Argument Analysis
The main purpose, thesis and arguments of the work are analyzed within the framework of textual integrity. The consistency of hypotheses is examined and improvement suggestions are provided.
References and Citation Analysis
References and in-text citations are meticulously checked. Formal and structural correction suggestions conforming to styles such as APA, MLA, and Chicago are provided.
Literature Analysis
The currency and adequacy of the literature used is analyzed. Source recommendations are provided to enhance the theoretical depth of the work in light of key sources in the field.
Structure and Organization Analysis
The logical flow and volume balance of introduction, methodology, findings and conclusion sections are analyzed. Suggestions to enhance the structural soundness of the text are provided.
Quality Enhancement Analysis
Strategic elements and advanced academic writing techniques are recommended to meet the standards of SSCI, SCI, AHCI and Scopus indexed journals.
Readability Analysis
The readability index of the text is calculated, complex structures and style errors that weaken fluency are identified, and concrete improvement suggestions are provided.
Blind Review/Authorship Analysis
Within the framework of academic ethical standards, elements that may violate the objective judgment or confidentiality of reviewers are identified and ethical compliance recommendations are developed.
Thematic Analysis
All components are evaluated in light of international index standards. A success score reflecting the academic competence of the text and strategic feedback are provided.
CONSORT 2025 Checklist Analysis
The work is subjected to technical review according to CONSORT 2025 standards. Elements weakening methodological compliance are identified to improve reporting quality.
Document Management
Upload, organize, and track the version history of your documents with ease.
DOCX Support
Upload your articles, theses, reports, and book chapters in Microsoft Word (.docx) format to start the analysis process.
Analysis Mode Selection
Choose the mode that suits your needs: full analysis, metadata extraction only, or bibliography analysis only.
Document Groups
Organize your documents into projects and groups to keep your research process structured.
Version History
Save different revisions of the same document and track changes between versions.
PDF & DOCX Export
Download analysis reports in PDF or DOCX format using customizable institutional templates.
QR Verification
Let anyone verify the authenticity of the document and the validity of the analysis using the QR code on the report.
Highlighted Document
Download the DOCX file with detected issues directly marked, and review each finding in context.
Email Delivery
Once the analysis report is ready, it is automatically sent to your email address — no waiting to download.
Team & Collaboration
Collaborate with team members and evaluate findings together.
Team Invitation
Invite teammates to document reviews and make decisions faster together.
Comment System
Leave comments on analysis findings, discuss, and share constructive feedback within the team.
Document Sharing
Share your documents with other users, enabling joint reading and review.
Real-Time Notifications
Get instantly notified when an analysis completes or a team member adds a comment.